USPTO serial 73566620
DR. VETTE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 27, 1987
- Examiner
- STINE, DAVID
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with DR. VETTE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
CORVETTE STAINLESS STEEL BRAKES, INC.
MIAMI, FL
Other trademarks owned by CORVETTE STAINLESS STEEL BRAKES, INC.
VETTE-SETTE GENERATION, INC., THE
NEW PHILADELPHIA, OH
VETTE-SETTE GENERATION, INC., THE
NEW PHILADELPHIA, OH
VETTE-SETTE GENERATION, INC., THE
NEW PHILADELPHIA, OH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph A. Sebolt
Joseph A. Sebolt SAND & SEBOLT4940 Munson Street NWAegis Tower, Suite 1100CANTON, OH 44718-3615Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | AUTOMOBILE BRAKE SYSTEM COMPONENTS, NAMELY DISC BRAKE CALIPERS, BRAKE LINES, PARKING BRAKE ASSEMBLIES, MOUNTING HARDWARE THEREFOR AND AUTOMOTIVE RESTORATION PARTS - NAMELY DOOR SILL PLATES, MAGNETIC OIL DRAIN PLUGS, FRONT SWAY ARM BUSHINGS AND DECORATIVE EXHAUST TIPS | ACTIVE | Nov 30, 1979 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CORVETTE STAINLESS STEEL BRAKES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by VETTE-SETTE GENERATION, INC., THE
- Other trademarks owned by VETTE-SETTE GENERATION, INC., THE
- Other trademarks owned by VETTE-SETTE GENERATION, INC., THE
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Similar marks named DR. VETTE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 27, 2026 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2017 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2017 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Mar 4, 2017 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Mar 4, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 9, 2017 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2006 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Dec 17, 2006 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Dec 17, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 15, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 15, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 27, 1992 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 28, 1992 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jan 27, 1987 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 4, 1986 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 5, 1986 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 9, 1986 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 4, 1986 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 1986 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 18, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 15, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |