USPTO serial 73567020
EX JUN YUMIKO TAMURA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EX JUN YUMIKO TAMURA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
TAITO-KU, TOKYO, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARTIN PAVANE
MARTIN PAVANE STIEFEL, GROSS, KURLAND & PAVANE551 FIFTH AVENEW YORK, NY 10176UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | RETAIL STORE SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF CLOTHING AND RELATED ACCESSORIES | ABANDONED | Sep 12, 1985 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 1986 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 11, 1986 | NAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 24, 1986 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 14, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 23, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |