USPTO serial 73567147
DERMIQUE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MANDIR, FREDERICK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DERMIQUE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | COSMETICS AND SKIN-CARE PRODUCTS NAMELY, MOISTURIZERS, NIGHT CREAMS, SCRUB CLEANSERS, AND ASTRINGENTS | ABANDONED | Feb 10, 1985 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 14, 1987 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 14, 1987 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 9, 1987 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 22, 1986 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 29, 1986 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 29, 1986 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 12, 1986 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 29, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 27, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 31, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 18, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 14, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 3, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 21, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |