USPTO serial 73567233
ORIGINAL ST GESCHENK STEINKAMP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MATTHEWS, AMOS
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ORIGINAL ST GESCHENK STEINKAMP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
RIETBERG 2 - NEUENKIRCHEN, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ELLIOT I. POLLOCK
ELLIOT I POLLOCK POLLOCK, VANDE SANDE AND PRIDDY1990 M ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | SMALL, MANUALLY OPERATED HOUSEHOLD AND KITCHEN APPLIANCES AS WELL AS PORTABLE CONTAINERS FOR USE IN THE HOUSEHOLD AND KITCHEN, MADE WHOLLY OR PREDOMINANTLY OF WOOD, E.G. SPICE CABINETS AND RACKS, ROLL HOLDERS, ONION RECEPTACLES, EGG TIMERS, PERPETUAL CALENDARS, HOLDERS FOR DRINKING VESSELS, CRUETS, EGG CUPS, CARVING BOARDS, CUTTING BOARDS, SPICE MILLS AND COFFEE GRINDERS (MANUALLY OPERATED), DISPLAY CASES, CUTLERY, CHEESE DISHES WITH GLASS COVERS, BUTTER DISHES WITH GLASS COVERS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 18, 1986 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 27, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |