USPTO serial 73567273
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT ALPERT
ROBERT ALPERT LADAS & PARRY26 W 61ST STNEW YORK, NY 10023-7604UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | CHEMICAL PRODUCTS DERIVED FROM PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS FOR USE AS INTERMEDIATE COMPOUNDS IN THE CHEMICAL INDUSTRY | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 004 | DIESEL FUELS AND GASOLINE; FULL LINE OF LUBRICANTS, INDUSTRIAL OILS AND GREASES; LAMP OIL AND KEROSENE | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 016 | ROAD MAPS; PAMPHLETS, BOOKS AND BROCHURES PROVIDING INSTRUCTIONS FOR UTILIZATION OF PETROLEUM DERIVATIVE PRODUCTS AND THE MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR OF ALL TYPES OF PETROLEUM FUELED LAND, SEA AND AIR VEHICLES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 3, 2008 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 4, 2002 | RRPR | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | — |
| Aug 3, 2001 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Jun 1, 2001 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 31, 2001 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 28, 2001 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Apr 6, 2001 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jun 12, 1997 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| Oct 25, 1996 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 25, 1996 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Feb 27, 1996 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Jan 4, 1991 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 27, 1990 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 21, 1989 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 20, 1989 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 8, 1989 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 1, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 1989 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 17, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 19, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 1988 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 29, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 1987 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 1986 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 14, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 27, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 22, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |