Drawing for LASER MARK-IT

USPTO serial 73567400

LASER MARK-IT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
—
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LASER MARK-IT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ARNOLD WEINTRAUB

ARNOLD WEINTRAUB BASILE, WEINTRAUB & HANLON900 TWR DRSTE 555TROY, MI 48098

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
040ENGRAVING SERVICES FOR OTHERS USING A LASER BEAMABANDONEDDec 14, 1984

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 11, 1988DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 19, 1988EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 29, 1988ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 28, 1988EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jul 20, 1987CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jul 6, 1987JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 6, 1987EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 27, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 25, 1986CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 21, 1986CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Aug 25, 1986CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 11, 1986CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 6, 1986CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 27, 1986DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance