USPTO serial 73568055
VICTORINA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VICTORINA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LAWRENCE E. ABELMAN
LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB708 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 28, 1995 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 28, 1995 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 28, 1995 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 2, 1992 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 16, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 15, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 16, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 15, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 15, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 21, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 11, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 12, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 24, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 11, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 7, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 30, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 31, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 1988 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 13, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |