USPTO serial 73568485
INFAX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAYERSCHOFF, GLENN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INFAX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JENNIFER L. STRANGE
JENNIFER L STRANGE ODIN, FELDMAN & PITTLEMAN10505 JUDICIAL DRP O BOX 367FAIRFAX, VA 22030Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | DEVELOPING AND MANAGING INFORMATION CLEARING HOUSES; CONDUCTING MARKET RESEARCH AND SURVEYS FOR OTHERS | ABANDONED | Sep 1, 1983 |
| 042 | WRITING AND EDITING SERVICES; KEY PUNCHING, TYPESETTING, PRINTING, DESIGNING PUBLICATIONS AND RELATED GRAPHIC ARTS SERVICES; PROVIDING BIBLIOGRAPHIC AND FULL TEXT DATABASES FOR INDUSTRY, PUBLISHERS, TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMPANIES, TRADE AND PROFESSIONAL ORGANIZATIONS AND GOVERNMENT | ABANDONED | Sep 1, 1983 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 19, 1987 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 19, 1987 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 6, 1987 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 4, 1987 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 16, 1986 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 17, 1986 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 14, 1986 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 7, 1986 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 1986 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 22, 1986 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 22, 1986 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 14, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 13, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |