USPTO serial 73568534
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT W. SACOFF
ROBERT W SACOFF SAIDMAN, STERNE, KESSLER & GOLDSTEIN1225 CONNECTICUT AVE N WWASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | OLIVE OIL, CANNED TOMATOES, CHEESES, FISH, PICKLED VEGETABLES, PICKLED FRUIT, PICKLED FISH, PICKLED MEAT, COOKED OR PROCESSED MEAT, PREPARED SALADS, FRUIT, EGGS, OILS, MILK, AND CHOCOLATE MILK | ABANDONED | — |
| 030 | ICE CREAM, PASTA, SAUCES, BREAD, CAKES, COOKIES, PIES, PASTRIES, CHOCOLATE AND SUGAR CONFECTIONERY | ABANDONED | — |
| 031 | VEGETABLES | ABANDONED | — |
| 032 | WATER, CHOCOLATE FLAVORED DRINKS, ARTIFICIALLY FLAVORED DRINKS, DRINK MIXES, CARBONATED AND UNCARBONATED BEVERAGES, JUICES, AND FRUIT DRINKS | ABANDONED | — |
| 033 | WINE | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 8, 1987 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 3, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 4, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |