Drawing for GOURMET LITE

USPTO serial 73568936

GOURMET LITE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HANNON, MARY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GOURMET LITE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOHN F. A. EARLEY

JOHN F A EARLEY HARDING, EARLEY, FOLLMER & FRAILEY1910 TWO MELLON BANK CTRBROAD ST AND S PENN SQPHILADELPHIA, PA 19102

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029NON-FROZEN LOW-SALT LUNCH MEATS, NON-FROZEN LOW-SALT FRANKFURTERS, AND NON-FROZEN LOW-SALT SAUSAGESABANDONEDFeb 15, 1985

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 14, 1989DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 12, 1989ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 12, 1989EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 8, 1988EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jul 14, 1988CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jun 14, 1988DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 21, 1988EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 29, 1987CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 24, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 21, 1986CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 23, 1986CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 7, 1986DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 23, 1986CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 17, 1986DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance