Drawing for BIOTHERAPEUTICS

USPTO serial 73569037

BIOTHERAPEUTICS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FOSTER, STEVEN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BIOTHERAPEUTICS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

RONALD V. THURMAN

RONALD V THURMAN HUBBARD, THURMAN, TURNER & TUCKER2100 ONE GALLERIA TWRDALLAS, TX 75240-6604UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042SERVICES IN THE NATURE OF RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND APPLICATION OF TECHNOLOGICAL APPROACHES FOR THE TREATMENT OF CANCERABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 29, 2024EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Nov 16, 1988EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 19, 1988ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 31, 1988EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Dec 10, 1987CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Sep 11, 1987EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 31, 1987CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jul 6, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 28, 1987CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 15, 1986CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 11, 1986CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 24, 1986CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 7, 1986CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 18, 1986CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 3, 1986DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance