USPTO serial 73569059
OHIO FORGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1502776Status 900
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 6, 1988
- Examiner
- FINE, STEVEN
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OHIO FORGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
ATLANTA, GA
ATLANTA, GA
ATLANTA, GA
WILMINGTON, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WILLIAM H. NEEDLE
WILLIAM H NEEDLE NEEDLE & ROSENBERGSTE 1200, THE CANDLER BLDG127 PEACHTREE ST N EATLANTA, GA 30303-1811Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | [ METAL FREE-STANDING TOOLS, NAMELY, UTILITY STANDS FOR POWER TOOLS AND BENCH VISES ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 1, 1985 |
| 007 | [ POWER OPERATED TOOLS, NAMELY PNEUMATIC HAMMERS, BENCH GRINDERS, ELECTRIC CIRCULAR SAWS, ELECTRIC BAND SAWS, MITRE SAWS, ELECTRIC BAND SANDERS, INDUSTRIAL-STRENGTH STAPLE GUNS, PNEUMATIC SANDERS, PNEUMATIC WRENCHES ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 1, 1985 |
| 008 | HAND OPERATED HAND TOOLS, NAMELY WRENCHES, PLIERS, CLAMPS, SCREWDRIVERS, AND SOCKET SETS FOR WRENCHES | EXPIRED | Oct 1, 1985 |
| 009 | MEASURING DEVICES, NAMELY MEASURING TAPES | EXPIRED | Oct 1, 1985 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by HOME DEPOT, INC., THE
- Other trademarks owned by HOME DEPOT, INC., THE
- Other trademarks owned by HOME DEPOT, INC., THE
- Other trademarks owned by HOMER TLC, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named OHIO FORGE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 2009 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jul 7, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 20, 1995 | C15P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 6, 1994 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jul 15, 1993 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 18, 1993 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Sep 6, 1988 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 14, 1988 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 16, 1988 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 8, 1988 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 29, 1988 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 1988 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 22, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 22, 1987 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 12, 1987 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 3, 1986 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 19, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 6, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 27, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |