USPTO serial 73569467
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID M. PITCHER
DAVID M PITCHER STAAS & HALSEY1825 K ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20006UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | COMMODITY EXCHANGE SERVICES, NAMELY THE TRADING OF FUTURES CONTRACTS AND OPTIONS, AND THE RELATED COMMODITY EXCHANGE ADVISORY SERVICES OF PERFORMING RESEARCH AND EDUCATION AND PROVIDING FACILITIES FOR CARRYING OUT THE TRADING AND INVESTMENT IN SUCH FUTURE CONTRACTS AND OPTIONS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 12, 1984 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 7, 1996 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 3, 1990 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jan 2, 1990 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 26, 1989 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 22, 1989 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| Jun 15, 1989 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 1989 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 1988 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 19, 1988 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 7, 1988 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 10, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 1986 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 2, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |