USPTO serial 73569671
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ANDREW V. GALWAY
ANDREW V GALWAY LIDDY, SULLIVAN, GALWAY & BEGLER80 FIFTH AVENEW YORK, NY 10011UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | SHOE POLISH | ABANDONED | — |
| 021 | SHOE BRUSHES, SHOE CLOTHS, SHOE HORNS AND SHOE TREES | ABANDONED | — |
| 026 | SHOE LACES; SHOE AND FOOT CARE PRODUCTS, NAMELY, SHOE DYES, INSOLES AND PADS, CORN AND BUNION REMEDIES, PADS OR CUSHIONS, FOOD DEODORANTS, AND NAIL CLIPPERS | ABANDONED | — |
| 037 | KNIFE SHARPENING SERVICES AND CARE, CLEANING AND REPAIR OF LEATHER GOODS, LUGGAGE, PURSES AND SPORTS EQUIPMENT; AND SHOE REPAIR AND SHOE POLISHING | ABANDONED | — |
| 040 | DYEING AND EMBOSSING OF LEATHER GOODS, AND LUGGAGE, PURSES AND SPORTS EQUIPMENT | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | KEY DUPLICATION SERVICES | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 20, 1987 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jul 16, 1987 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 17, 1987 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 18, 1986 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 22, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 21, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |