Drawing for MONEYSWORTH & BEST

USPTO serial 73569671

MONEYSWORTH & BEST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SALEMI, DOMINICK
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MONEYSWORTH & BEST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ANDREW V. GALWAY

ANDREW V GALWAY LIDDY, SULLIVAN, GALWAY & BEGLER80 FIFTH AVENEW YORK, NY 10011UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003SHOE POLISHABANDONED—
021SHOE BRUSHES, SHOE CLOTHS, SHOE HORNS AND SHOE TREESABANDONED—
026SHOE LACES; SHOE AND FOOT CARE PRODUCTS, NAMELY, SHOE DYES, INSOLES AND PADS, CORN AND BUNION REMEDIES, PADS OR CUSHIONS, FOOD DEODORANTS, AND NAIL CLIPPERSABANDONED—
037KNIFE SHARPENING SERVICES AND CARE, CLEANING AND REPAIR OF LEATHER GOODS, LUGGAGE, PURSES AND SPORTS EQUIPMENT; AND SHOE REPAIR AND SHOE POLISHINGABANDONED—
040DYEING AND EMBOSSING OF LEATHER GOODS, AND LUGGAGE, PURSES AND SPORTS EQUIPMENTABANDONED—
042KEY DUPLICATION SERVICESABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 20, 1987PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Jul 16, 1987PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jun 17, 1987ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 18, 1986CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 22, 1986CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 21, 1986CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 11, 1986DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance