USPTO serial 73569710
ENZED
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ABRAMS, JACQUELINE WILLETTE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ENZED?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
MT WELLINGTON, AUCKLAND, NZ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARY HELEN SEARS
MARY HELEN SEARS GINSBURG, FELDMAN AND BRESS, CHARTERED1250 CONNECTICUT AVE N WWASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 1989 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 30, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 7, 1988 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 28, 1987 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 22, 1987 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 8, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 8, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 4, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |