USPTO serial 73569722
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA
SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA
SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA
SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
I. MORLEY DRUCKER
THOMAS J MADDEN ESQ ADAMSKI MOROSKI MADDEN & GREEN LLP1200 VINE STPASO ROBLES, CA 93446UNITED STATESCopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 19, 2008 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Oct 24, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 11, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 19, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 28, 1993 | 8.PR | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 22, 1993 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Apr 14, 1987 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 20, 1987 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 18, 1986 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 28, 1986 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 15, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 18, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |