USPTO serial 73569887
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
RICHMOND, BRITISH COLUMBIA, CA
RICHMOND, BRITISH COLUMBIA, CA
RICHMOND, BRITISH COLUMBIA V6V 1Y6, CA
RICHMOND, BRITISH COLUMBIA, CA
MUSTANG ENGINEERED TECHNICAL APPAREL CORP.
RICHMOND BRITISH COLUMBIA, CA
Other trademarks owned by MUSTANG ENGINEERED TECHNICAL APPAREL CORP.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DONALD A. KAUL
LISA A OSMAN ESQ DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP370 17TH ST STE 4700DENVER, CO 80202UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | INDUSTRIAL AND RECREATIONAL MARINE FLOTATION GARMENTS, NAMELY, COATS, VESTS, COVERALLS, SUITS, JACKETS AND SAILING HARNESSES; HYBRID PERSONAL FLOTATION DEVICES, NAMELY, LIFEJACKETS, LIFEVESTS, SAILING HARNESSES AND COMBINATION PERSONAL FLOTATION DEVICES AND SAILING HARNESSES; AND INFLATABLE FLOTATION GARMENTS, NAMELY, LIFEJACKETS, LIFEVESTS, COMBINATION SAILING HARNESSES AND LIFEJACKETS, AND COMBINATION SAILING HARNESSES AND LIFEVESTS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 025 | FOUL WEATHER GEAR, NAMELY, COATS, VESTS, COVERALLS, SUITS, JACKETS AND PANTS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 15, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Dec 2, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 24, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2001 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Feb 20, 2001 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Sep 21, 2000 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Mar 14, 1997 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 10, 1997 | RRPR | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | — |
| Oct 31, 1996 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Sep 24, 1996 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Sep 25, 1990 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 22, 1989 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 22, 1989 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 28, 1989 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 28, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 22, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 26, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 1988 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 25, 1987 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 2, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 3, 1986 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 22, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 11, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |