Drawing for ENGLISH LAVENDER

USPTO serial 73570032

ENGLISH LAVENDER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
—
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ENGLISH LAVENDER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

H. JOHN CAMPAIGN

H JOHN CAMPAIGN GRAHAM, CAMPAIGN & MCCARTHY36 W 44TH STNEW YORK, NY 10036-8178UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003COSMETIC AND TOILET PREPARATIONS--NAMELY, PERFUME, COLOGNE, HAND AND BODY LOTIONS, BATH OILS, BATH AND SHOWER GELS, TOILET AND BATH SOAPSABANDONEDJan 1, 1980

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 16, 1989ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
May 15, 1989CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Apr 24, 1989CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 16, 1989CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 11, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 7, 1988CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 22, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 17, 1987CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 18, 1987ZZZZALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Oct 6, 1986CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 12, 1986CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 1, 1986ZZZZALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Feb 13, 1986CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 13, 1986ZZZZALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Feb 7, 1986DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance