USPTO serial 73570381
TRITAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HINES PATRICK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TRITAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
L. LAWTON ROGERS, III
L LAWTON ROGERS III510 KING ST STE 408ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | MICRO COMPUTER AND MICRO COMPUTER EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, ELECTRICAL BUSES, MICROPROCESSORS, COMMUNICATION STORAGE UNITS AND MEMORIES, PRINTER DISPATCHER, GRAPHIC CONTROLLERS, TRANSDUCERS AND PERIPHERALS, NAMELY, PRINTERS, MOUSE AND PLOTTERS AND WORK STATIONS COMPRISING MONITOR, DISK, DISKETTE AND COMPUTER PROGRAMS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 31, 1988 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 16, 1988 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 8, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 1987 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 15, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 11, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 13, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |