USPTO serial 73570521
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BRUCE L. ADAMS, ESQUIRE
BRUCE L ADAMS ESQ ADAMS & WILKS500 FIFTH AVE STE 3200NEW YORK, NY 10110UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | DOLLS, DOLLS' CLOTHING AND ACCESSORIES FOR DOLLS | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 18, 1992 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 4, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 12, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 2, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 2, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 1990 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Nov 2, 1990 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 21, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 29, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 30, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 19, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 11, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 21, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 16, 1987 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 2, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |