Drawing for WATER BABIES

USPTO serial 73570521

WATER BABIES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUSH, KAREN K
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WATER BABIES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

BRUCE L. ADAMS, ESQUIRE

BRUCE L ADAMS ESQ ADAMS & WILKS500 FIFTH AVE STE 3200NEW YORK, NY 10110UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028DOLLS, DOLLS' CLOTHING AND ACCESSORIES FOR DOLLSABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 18, 1992ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Dec 3, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 4, 1992CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 28, 1992CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 21, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 12, 1991CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 11, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 2, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 2, 1991CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 28, 1990REINREINSTATED—
Nov 2, 1990ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 21, 1990CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 20, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 29, 1989CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 3, 1989CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 30, 1989CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 26, 1989DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 19, 1988DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 11, 1988CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 7, 1988DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 21, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 16, 1987CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 9, 1986CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 8, 1986DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 2, 1986CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 26, 1986CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance