USPTO serial 73570707
AMERLITE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NELSON, EDWARD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AMERLITE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
AMERSHAM BUCKINGHAMSHIRE, GB
BUCKINGHAMSHIRE, GB
AMERSHAM, BUCKINGHAMSHIRE, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RONALD S. KAREKEN
RONALD S KAREKEN EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY343 STATE STROCHESTER, NY 14650UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | CHEMICAL PRODUCTS FOR USE IN SCIENCE; CHEMICALS AND ASSAY KITS COMPRISED PRIMARILY OF DIAGNOSTIC REAGENTS FOR IN VITRO USE IN MEDICAL DIAGNOSIS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by AMERLITE DIAGNOSTICS LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by AMERSHAM INTERNATIONAL PLC
- Other trademarks owned by AMERLITE DIAGNOSTICS LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Similar marks named AMERLITE
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 8, 1994 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 20, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 28, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 29, 1992 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| May 29, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 23, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 8, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 7, 1988 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 4, 1987 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 1986 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 6, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |