USPTO serial 73570996
SANTA FE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 10, 1989
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE DESTROYED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SANTA FE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
CONSERVAS DE BAJA CALIFORNIA, S.A. DE C.V.
CHULA VISTA, CA
Other trademarks owned by CONSERVAS DE BAJA CALIFORNIA, S.A. DE C.V.
CONSERVAS DE BAJA CALIFORNIA, S.A. DE C.V.
CHULA VISTA, CA
Other trademarks owned by CONSERVAS DE BAJA CALIFORNIA, S.A. DE C.V.
CONSERVAS DE BAJA CALIFORNIA, S.A. DE C.V.
CHULA VISTA, CA
Other trademarks owned by CONSERVAS DE BAJA CALIFORNIA, S.A. DE C.V.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GEORGE J. RUBENS
GEORGE J RUBENS2117 BLACKMORE CTSAN DIEGO, CA 92109UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | REFRIED BEANS, CACTUS IN BRINE PROCESSED GREEN CHILES, DRIED AND COOKED GRAPES VINE LEAVES; PROCESSED MARASCHINO GRAPES, MAYONNAISE, PICKLED PEPPERS, SALAD DRESSINGS AND CANNED TOMATOES | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | MOLE PASTE, SAUCES, EXCLUDING APPLE SAUCE AND CRANBERRY SAUCE, TEAS | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CONSERVAS DE BAJA CALIFORNIA, S.A. DE C.V.
- Other trademarks owned by CONSERVAS DE BAJA CALIFORNIA, S.A. DE C.V.
- Other trademarks owned by CONSERVAS DE BAJA CALIFORNIA, S.A. DE C.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named SANTA FE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 13, 1990 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 27, 1990 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Aug 31, 1990 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 13, 1990 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 10, 1989 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 18, 1988 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 21, 1988 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 20, 1988 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 5, 1988 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 27, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 27, 1988 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 25, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 28, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 1, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 28, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 4, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 1987 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 31, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |