USPTO serial 73571537
KOMATSU VANGUARD SERIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FINE, STEVEN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KOMATSU VANGUARD SERIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RONALD P. KANANEN
RONALD P KANANEN VORYS, SATER, SEYMOUR & PEASESTE 11111828 L ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20036Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | EARTH-WORKING MACHINERY, NAMELY BULLDOZER, TIRE-DOZER, MOTOR SCRAPER, RIPPER AND RAKE-DOZER; EARTH-HANDLING MACHINERY, NAMELY SHOVEL LOADER, WHEEL LOADER, COMPACTOR; EXCAVATORS, NAMELY BACK-HOE, DOZER-SHOVEL, POWER SHOVEL, BUCKET EXCAVATOR, MINING SHOVEL, TRENCHER, TUNNEL BORING MACHINE; CONSTRUCTION MACHINERY, NAMELY ROAD-ROLLER, DROP-HAMMER, ASPHALT FINISHER, TIRE-ROLLER, PIPE-LAYER, VIBRATION ROLLER, AND MOTOR GRADER; COMPONENT PARTS AND FOR SAID GOODS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9, 1988 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 22, 1988 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 14, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 1987 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 1986 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 1986 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |