USPTO serial 73571606
KASTLE D-LITE BURGERS A ROYAL TREAT IN EVERY BITE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WILLIAMS, RON
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KASTLE D-LITE BURGERS A ROYAL TREAT IN EVERY BITE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HARVEY B. JACOBSON
HARVEY B JACOBSON1217 E ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20004UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | FROZEN HAMBURGER SANDWICHES SOLD PRINCIPALLY THROUGH SUPERMARKETS | ABANDONED | Mar 15, 1985 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 10, 1990 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 15, 1990 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 15, 1990 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 29, 1987 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 7, 1987 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 8, 1987 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 6, 1987 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 17, 1986 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Nov 17, 1986 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 16, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 8, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 6, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |