USPTO serial 73572356
LA CHARCUTERIE ALSACIENNE CCA 1876 MULHOUSE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 10, 1989
- Examiner
- NELSON, EDWARD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with LA CHARCUTERIE ALSACIENNE CCA 1876 MULHOUSE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
SOCIETE FINANCIERE DE DEVELOPPEMENT (S.A.)
PARIS, FR
Other trademarks owned by SOCIETE FINANCIERE DE DEVELOPPEMENT (S.A.)
SOCIETE FINANCIERE DE DEVELOPPEMENT (S.A.)
PARIS, FR
Other trademarks owned by SOCIETE FINANCIERE DE DEVELOPPEMENT (S.A.)
SOCIETE FINANCIERE DE DEVELOPPEMENT (S.A.)
PARIS, FR
Other trademarks owned by SOCIETE FINANCIERE DE DEVELOPPEMENT (S.A.)
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT J. PATCH
ROBERT J PATCH C/O YOUNG & THOMPSON745 S 23TH STARLINGTON, VA 22202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | CROQUETTES - NAMELY, ALIMENTARY CROQUETTES, IN PARTICULAR MEAT, FISH, VEGETABLE AND FRUIT BASE CROQUETTES, POTATO CHIPS AND POTATO CRISPS; PREPARED MEAT PRODUCTS - NAMELY, MEAT; MILK PRODUCTS - NAMELY WHEY AND MILK, YOGURT, CREAM, BUTTER AND CHEESE; FISH PRODUCTS - NAMELY, FISH, PRESERVED, DRIED, FROZEN AND DEEP FROZEN FISH; SALTED FOODS - NAMELY, SALTED MEAT AND FISH, COCONUT FAT - NAMELY, FAT, OIL AND COCOA BUTTER FOR FOOD; JELLIES FOR FOOD - NAMELY, MEAT, FISH, VEGETABLE OR FRUIT JUICE-BASED; MEAT PATES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SOCIETE FINANCIERE DE DEVELOPPEMENT (S.A.)
- Other trademarks owned by SOCIETE FINANCIERE DE DEVELOPPEMENT (S.A.)
- Other trademarks owned by SOCIETE FINANCIERE DE DEVELOPPEMENT (S.A.)
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Similar marks named LA CHARCUTERIE ALSACIENNE CCA 1876 MULHOUSE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 16, 1996 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 10, 1989 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 18, 1989 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 17, 1989 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 5, 1989 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 14, 1989 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 5, 1988 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 27, 1988 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 23, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 23, 1988 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 29, 1987 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 5, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 2, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 16, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |