CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for PRINCIPLES OF TECHNOLOGY

USPTO serial 73572402

PRINCIPLES OF TECHNOLOGY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1421565Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 16, 1986
Examiner
MATTHEWS, AMOS
Law office
EXECUTIVE ACCESS

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with PRINCIPLES OF TECHNOLOGY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Marcus W. Hammack

Marcus W. Hammack COWAN, LIEBOWITZ & LATMAN, PC1133 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036-6799UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016TEACHERS' GUIDESSECTION 8 - CANCELLED—
041EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, NAMELY PROVIDING COURSES IN THE FIELD OF TECHNOLOGYSECTION 8 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 4, 2018C8.TCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)—
Feb 8, 2007RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Feb 8, 200789AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Feb 8, 2007PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Dec 4, 200689AFREGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED—
Dec 4, 2006E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Sep 28, 2006CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jan 6, 1994COC.CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED—
May 20, 1993AMD7SEC 7 REQUEST FILED—
Mar 23, 19938.OKREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTEDThe USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline.
Dec 15, 1992815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED—
Dec 16, 1986R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
Oct 21, 1986CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER—
Oct 15, 1986CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Oct 14, 1986ZZZZALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Sep 29, 1986CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Aug 15, 1986CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 19, 1986CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 6, 1986DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance