Drawing for NORTHEAST EXCHANGE

USPTO serial 73572563

NORTHEAST EXCHANGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TAYLOR, CRAIG
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NORTHEAST EXCHANGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

HAROLD E. MEIER

HAROLD E MEIER GARDERE & WYNNE1500 DIAMOND SHAMROCK TWRDALLAS, TX 75201UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036AUTOMATED TELLER MACHINE BANKING SERVICESABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 6, 1988EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 3, 1988ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 3, 1988EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jan 28, 1988CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Sep 30, 1987CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Sep 1, 1987JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 13, 1987CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Mar 12, 1987JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 10, 1987EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 30, 1986CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 19, 1986CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 4, 1986CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 12, 1986DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance