USPTO serial 73572728
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
ETOBICOKE, ONTARIO, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT W. SACOFF
ROBERT W SACOFF SAIDMAN, STERNE, KESSLER & GOLDSTEIN1225 CONNECTICUT AVEWASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | EQUIPMENT SOLD AS A UNIT FOR PLAYING A BOARD GAME | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 14, 1989 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 31, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 31, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 1988 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 21, 1987 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 29, 1987 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 23, 1987 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 29, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 29, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 28, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 13, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 3, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |