USPTO serial 73573086
TILLERPILOT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 9, 1988
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with TILLERPILOT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
1366 LYSAKER, NO
BROADSTAIRS, KENT, GB
BROADSTAIRS, KENT, GB
BROADSTAIRS, KENT, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles P. LaPolla
Charles P. LaPolla Ostrolenk, Faber, Gerb & Soffen, LLP1180 Avenue of the Americas7th FloorNew York, NY 10036-8403Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | NAUTICAL INSTRUMENTS, NAMELY, AUTOMATIC PILOT CONTROLS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 10, 1984 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by NAVICO HOLDING AS
- Other trademarks owned by NAVICO LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by TIMELOCK LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by NAVICO LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named TILLERPILOT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 2009 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Dec 3, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 3, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 18, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 11, 1994 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Dec 6, 1993 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Aug 9, 1988 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jun 24, 1988 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 23, 1988 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 6, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 1, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 23, 1987 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 1987 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 2, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 25, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 5, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |