CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for ERTE

USPTO serial 73573162

ERTE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1771455Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 18, 1993
Examiner
MCDONALD, MARY KAY
Law office
SCANNING ON DEMAND

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with ERTE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Howard N. Aronson

HOWARD N ARONSON LACKENBACH SIEGEL LLPLACKENBACH SIEGEL BLDGONE CHASE RDSCARSDALE, NY 10583

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018SATCHELS, TRAVELLING TRUNKS, SUITCASES, CARRY-ON BAGS, TRAVELLING BAGS, TRAVELLING BAG SETS, BRIEF CASES, POCKET WALLETS, PURSES, HANDBAGS, UMBRELLAS, PARASOLSSECTION 8 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 12, 2016CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Jul 10, 2013ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Oct 11, 2007CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 11, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 11, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 12, 2003RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Jul 12, 200389AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
May 2, 200389AFREGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED—
May 2, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 6, 1999C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
May 4, 1999815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED—
May 18, 1993R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 23, 1993PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 22, 1993NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 7, 1992CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 25, 1992CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Nov 4, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 12, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 16, 1991CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
May 20, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 20, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 11, 1991CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 9, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 11, 1990CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 26, 1990PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jan 31, 1990PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Oct 19, 1989ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 10, 1989CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 11, 1988CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 14, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 11, 1987CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 7, 1986CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 25, 1986CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 8, 1986CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance