USPTO serial 73573213
ERTE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ZAK, HENRY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ERTE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ELOISE L. MORGAN
ELOISE L MORGAN WINTHROP, STIMSON, PUTNAM & ROBERTSONE BATTERY PARK PLZNEW YORK, NY 10004-1490UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 027 | CARPETS, RUGS (FLOOR COVERINGS); MATS, MATTING; COVERINGS FOR EXISTING FLOORS, WALL COVERINGS (NON-TEXTILE) | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 29, 1991 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 4, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 11, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 11, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 1990 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 31, 1990 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 1989 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 10, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 1987 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 3, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 20, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |