USPTO serial 73573361
PPRO-SEAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MANDIR, FREDERICK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PPRO-SEAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
TIPTON D. JENNINGS
TIPTON D JENNINGS FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, ET AL1775 K ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20006UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | POLYPROPYLENE PIPING SYSTEMS, NAMELY, PLASTIC PIPE AND PLASTIC PIPE FITTINGS FOR USE WHERE HIGH PURITY AND CORROSION RESISTANCE IS REQUIRED IN TRANSPORTING WATER, CHEMICALS, FOOD OR OTHER SUBSTANCES | ABANDONED | Apr 6, 1983 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 1988 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 11, 1988 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 11, 1988 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Sep 25, 1987 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 1987 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 5, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 16, 1987 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 1986 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 10, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |