Drawing for MIFED

USPTO serial 73573567

MIFED

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1484651Status 900
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 12, 1988
Examiner
—
Law office
SCANNING ON DEMAND

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MIFED?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ROBERT F.I. CONTE

ROBERT F I CONTE LAFF, WHITESEL, CONTE & SARET401 N MICHIGAN AVECHICAGO, IL 60642UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041ARRANGING AND CONDUCTING ENTERTAINMENT EVENTS IN THE FORM OF FILM FAIRS FOR DISPLAYING AND PROMOTING MOTION PICTURE FILMS AND THE LIKEEXPIRED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 17, 2009CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
May 31, 2007CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Nov 29, 1993RRPRRESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION—
Sep 29, 1993PR23POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15—
May 5, 1993815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED—
Apr 12, 1988R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 19, 1988PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 18, 1987NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 23, 1987CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 2, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 19, 1987CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 28, 1986CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 22, 1986CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Sep 30, 1986DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 8, 1986CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 11, 1986CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 19, 1986DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance