USPTO serial 73573613
STATUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLARK, ROBERT C
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with STATUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
MELBOURNE, VICTORIA, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BENASUTTI & MURRAY
BENASUTTI & MURRAY 11TH & MARKET STSSTE 2701, THE ARA TWRONE READING CTRPHILADELPHIA, PA 19107-2927Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | FABRIC PROTECTION CHEMICALS FOR USE WITH VEHICLES | ABANDONED | — |
| 003 | CAR CARE PREPARATION, NAMELY, SURFACE TREATMENTS FOR THE BAKED ENAMEL FINISH OF THE CAR, WINDSCREEN CLEANERS, WHEEL CLEANERS, AUTOMATIVE PLASTIC PART CLEANERS, AUTOMATIVE CARPET CLEANERS, AND LEATHER YL CLEANERS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 4, 1993 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 1, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 2, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 29, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 1987 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 20, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |