USPTO serial 73573960
PING PAO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PING PAO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HERBERT COHEN
HERBERT COHEN WIGMAN & COHENSTE 200 CRYSTAL SQ 51735 JEFFERSON DAVIS HWYARLINGTON, VA 22202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | WINES, PREPARED WINE COCKTAILS, WINE COOLERS, WINE-BASED APERITIFS, LIQUEURS, RUM, BRANDY, GIN, WHISKEY, VODKA, PREPARED ALCOHOLIC COCKTAILS, AND DISTILLED LIQUOR BASED APERITIFS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5, 1991 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 22, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 9, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 30, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 13, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 18, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 7, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 9, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 23, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 23, 1989 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 14, 1988 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 14, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 21, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 1988 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 18, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 20, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 13, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 13, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 13, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 18, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 14, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |