USPTO serial 73574602
THE ORIGINAL SOURDOUGH SAN FRANCISCO SINCE 1856
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 9, 1988
- Examiner
- FINGERET, DONALD
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with THE ORIGINAL SOURDOUGH SAN FRANCISCO SINCE 1856?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
SAN FRANCISCO, CA
SAN FRANCISCO FRENCH BREAD COMPANY
OAKLAND, CA
Other trademarks owned by SAN FRANCISCO FRENCH BREAD COMPANY
IRVING, TX
SAN FRANCISCO FRENCH BREAD COMPANY
OAKLAND, CA
Other trademarks owned by SAN FRANCISCO FRENCH BREAD COMPANY
SAN FRANCISCO FRENCH BREAD COMPANY
OAKLAND, CA
Other trademarks owned by SAN FRANCISCO FRENCH BREAD COMPANY
SAN FRANCISCO FRENCH BREAD COMPANY
OAKLAND, CA
Other trademarks owned by SAN FRANCISCO FRENCH BREAD COMPANY
IRVING, TX
IRVING, TX
INTERSTATE BAKERIES CORPORATION
KANSAS CITY, MO
SAN FRANCISCO, CA
IRVING, TX
INTERSTATE BAKERIES CORPORATION
KANSAS CITY, MO
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas H. Van Hoozer
PATRICK D KUEHL JR Coblentz, Patch, Duffy & Bass LLPOne Montgomery Street, Suite 3000San Francisco, CA 94104UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | BREAD | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 31, 1973 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BOUDIN IP, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SAN FRANCISCO FRENCH BREAD COMPANY
- Other trademarks owned by HOSTESS BRANDS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SAN FRANCISCO FRENCH BREAD COMPANY
- Other trademarks owned by SAN FRANCISCO FRENCH BREAD COMPANY
- Other trademarks owned by SAN FRANCISCO FRENCH BREAD COMPANY
- Other trademarks owned by HOSTESS BRANDS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by HOSTESS BRANDS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by INTERSTATE BAKERIES CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by BOUDIN IP, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by HOSTESS BRANDS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by INTERSTATE BAKERIES CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named THE ORIGINAL SOURDOUGH SAN FRANCISCO SINCE 1856
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 18, 2022 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Aug 9, 2017 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2013 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 17, 2011 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Nov 17, 2011 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 17, 2011 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 21, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 29, 2010 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 2, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 25, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 19, 2008 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Aug 19, 2008 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jul 18, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 9, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 27, 2008 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 20, 1994 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Feb 22, 1994 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Aug 9, 1988 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jun 2, 1988 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| May 31, 1988 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 23, 1987 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 1987 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 6, 1987 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 31, 1986 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 14, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 14, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 14, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 14, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 14, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 5, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |