Drawing for SALES FOLLOW-UP

USPTO serial 73574798

SALES FOLLOW-UP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FOSTER, STEVEN
Law office
OFFICE OF THE SOLICITOR

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SALES FOLLOW-UP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

GOMER W. WALTERS

GOMER W. WALTERS HAIGHT, HOFELDT, DAVIS & JAMBOR3614 MID CONTINENTAL PLAZA 55 EAST MONROE STREETCHICAGO, IL 60603UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035BUSINESS SERVICES, NAMELY, SOLICITING REPEAT AND REFERRAL BUSINESS FOR AUTOMOBILE DEALERSHIPSABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 22, 1989ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 22, 1989EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 22, 1989EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 28, 1988EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jan 26, 1988CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jul 22, 1987CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jul 10, 1987JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 9, 1987EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 3, 1986CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 1, 1986CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 28, 1986CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 26, 1986DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance