Drawing for CRITI CARE A NEW GENERATION IN EMERGENCY CARE PRODUCTS

USPTO serial 73574804

CRITI CARE A NEW GENERATION IN EMERGENCY CARE PRODUCTS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FOSTER, STEVEN
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CRITI CARE A NEW GENERATION IN EMERGENCY CARE PRODUCTS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

M. ARTHUR AUSLANDER

M ARTHUR AUSLANDER AUSLANDER & THOMASSTE 70536 W 44TH STNEW YORK, NY 10036

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042MAIL ORDER CATALOG SERVICES AND PHONE ORDER SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF FIRST AID KITS, FIRST AID SUPPLIES AND MEDICAL EQUIPMENTABANDONEDNov 6, 1985

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 19, 1989ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 16, 1988EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Sep 1, 1987CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
May 14, 1987EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 5, 1987CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Feb 27, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 17, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 6, 1987CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Dec 5, 1986CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 7, 1986CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 28, 1986CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 26, 1986CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 26, 1986DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance