USPTO serial 73578920
FRUIT 'N FIVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DEMOS, JOHN C., JR.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FRUIT 'N FIVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
WINDSOR, CA
WINDSOR, ONTARIO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOSEPH A. DEGRANDI, ET AL
BEVERIDGE, DEGRANDI & WEILACHERSTE 11001819 H ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20006Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | FRUIT JUICE DRINKS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 30, 1990 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 20, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 16, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 3, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 13, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 1987 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 4, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 1987 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 19, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |