USPTO serial 73579388
BIOANALYTICAL SYSTEMS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FISHER, HANNAH
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BIOANALYTICAL SYSTEMS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SCOTT V. KISSINGER
SCOTT V KISSINGER ICE MILLER DONADIO & RYANONE AMERICAN SQBOX 82001INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46282-0002Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTATION FOR THE DETERMINATION OF TRACE AMOUNTS OF ORGANIC COMPOUNDS IN BIOLOGICAL, ENVIRONMENTAL, AND INDUSTRIAL SAMPLES, SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTATION FOR THE ELECTROCHEMICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF ADVANCED MATERIALS SUCH AS ALLOYS, COATINGS, SEMICONDUCTORS, AND BATTERY ELECTRODES, AND OTHER SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTATION AND ASSOCIATED GOODS OF APPLICANT, NAMELY ELECTROCHEMICAL ANALYZERS, CATECHOLAMINE ANALYZERS, ACETYLCHOLINE ANALYZERS, AND VOLTAMMOGRAPHS, FOR ELECTROCHEMICAL APPLICATIONS | ABANDONED | Dec 21, 1974 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 25, 1988 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 4, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 3, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |