USPTO serial 73579890
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
SANTA BARBARA, CA
SANTA BARBARA, CA
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | INSTRUMENTS FOR ANALYZING AND MONITORING THE PURITY OF POTABLE WATER | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 15, 2008 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Oct 25, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 21, 1993 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Apr 5, 1993 | RRPR | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | — |
| Mar 11, 1993 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Nov 16, 1992 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Jun 9, 1987 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Apr 9, 1987 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 1, 1987 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 1987 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 1, 1986 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 5, 1986 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 11, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |