USPTO serial 73580267
GOODMAN MANTEAU
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REIHNER, DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GOODMAN MANTEAU?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | MEN'S, WOMEN'S AND CHILDREN'S GARMENTS, NAMELY HATS, COATS, SUITS, SLACKS, RAINCOATS, SCARVES, HANDKERCHIEFS, HOSE, SHIRTS, SHORTS, SWIM SUITS, SHOES, SWEATERS, GLOVES, HOUSECOATS, JACKETS, CAR COATS, WOMEN'S AND CHILDREN'S GARMENTS, NAMELY FURS, DRESSES, SKIRTS, BLOUSES, PANTIES; WOMEN'S GARMENTS NAMELY FOUNDATION GARMENTS, LINGERIE, GIRDLES, BRASSIERES, SLIPS, NIGHTGOWNS; CHILDREN'S SLEEPWEAR; MEN'S PYJAMAS, TIES AND UNDERWEAR | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 16, 1991 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 4, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 8, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 25, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 16, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 1988 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 1987 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |