Drawing for NEW JERUSALEM CHURCH

USPTO serial 73580834

NEW JERUSALEM CHURCH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
OMELKO, NANCY LOU
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NEW JERUSALEM CHURCH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041RELIGIOUS WORSHIP SERVICES AND EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, NAMELY THE EDUCATIONAL SERVICES OF CONDUCTING SEMINARS IN THE STUDY OF HOLY SCRIPTURESABANDONEDJun 23, 1985

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 6, 1988EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Jun 24, 1988EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED
Jan 19, 1988CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED
Oct 6, 1987EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Aug 19, 1987ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Feb 18, 1987CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 24, 1986CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 19, 1986CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 3, 1986DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance