USPTO serial 73582450
NATURAL CURL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NATURAL CURL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KIRK M. MCINERNEY
KIRK M MCINERNEY325 N WELLS STCHICAGO, IL 60610UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | ELECTRICALLY HEATED HAIR CURLING IRONS | ABANDONED | Sep 23, 1985 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 1989 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 13, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 28, 1988 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 1987 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 21, 1987 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 1986 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |