USPTO serial 73585720
PERKY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ZAK, HENRY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PERKY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
EDWARD S. WRIGHT
EDWARD S WRIGHT FLEHR, HOHBACH, TEST, ALBRITTON, ET ALSTE 3400FOUR EMBARCADERO CTRSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-4187Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | OFFICE EQUIPMENT, NAMELY PAPER HOLDERS FOR HOLDING PAPERS IN AN UPRIGHT, ERECT POSITION | ABANDONED | Oct 19, 1984 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 1989 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 16, 1988 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 16, 1988 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Aug 11, 1988 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 1988 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 1987 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 6, 1987 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 14, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 1987 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 14, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |