CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for Serial No. 73585887

USPTO serial 73585887

Serial No. 73585887

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1500044Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 9, 1988
Examiner
—
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with Serial No. 73585887?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

CHARLES T.J. WEIGELL

CHARLES T.J. WEIGELL FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU, P.C.4 TIMES SQUARE, 17TH FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES, NAMELY, VODKASECTION 8 - CANCELLEDJan 1, 1963

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 10, 2019C8.TCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)—
Apr 5, 2017CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - ADDRESS UPDATED—
Jan 31, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 9, 2009RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Feb 9, 200989AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Feb 9, 2009PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Feb 4, 2009E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Jul 18, 2008CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 19, 2006A7OKAMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED—
Jun 12, 2006PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Jun 23, 2004AMD7SEC 7 REQUEST FILED—
May 12, 2004CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Apr 6, 2004CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Apr 6, 2004CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Apr 6, 2004CANDCANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999—
Jul 14, 2003PRA7REGISTERED - SEC. 7 REQUEST ABANDONED—
Aug 12, 2002PRAMPOST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7—
May 31, 2002AMD7SEC 7 REQUEST FILED—
Dec 2, 1997PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jan 21, 19958.OKREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTEDThe USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline.
Jul 18, 1994815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED—
Aug 9, 1988R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
May 16, 1988CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER—
May 9, 1988CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 2, 1987CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 15, 1987CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 17, 1987CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 2, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 12, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 7, 1987DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 8, 1986CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance