USPTO serial 73586037
GROFEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 9, 1990
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with GROFEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
ARES SERONO NV, AMSTERDAM, SUCCURSALE DE GENEVE
GENEVA, CH
Other trademarks owned by ARES SERONO NV, AMSTERDAM, SUCCURSALE DE GENEVE
ARES SERONO NV, AMSTERDAM, SUCCURSALE DE GENEVE
GENEVA, CH
Other trademarks owned by ARES SERONO NV, AMSTERDAM, SUCCURSALE DE GENEVE
ARES SERONO NV, AMSTERDAM, SUCCURSALE DE GENEVE
GENEVA, CH
Other trademarks owned by ARES SERONO NV, AMSTERDAM, SUCCURSALE DE GENEVE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
EDWARD A. MEILMAN
EDWARD A MEILMAN OSTROLENK, FABER, GERB & SOFFEN1180 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITION CONTAINING EPIDERMAL GROWTH FACTOR AS ACTIVE INGREDIENT | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ARES SERONO NV, AMSTERDAM, SUCCURSALE DE GENEVE
- Other trademarks owned by ARES SERONO NV, AMSTERDAM, SUCCURSALE DE GENEVE
- Other trademarks owned by ARES SERONO NV, AMSTERDAM, SUCCURSALE DE GENEVE
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named GROFEN
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 15, 1996 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 9, 1990 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 17, 1989 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 16, 1989 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 11, 1989 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 11, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 15, 1988 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Sep 20, 1988 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 20, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 8, 1988 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 1987 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| May 14, 1987 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 14, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 4, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 1, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 2, 1986 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 1, 1986 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 2, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 23, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |