USPTO serial 73586229
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
WASHINGTON, DC
GROUP 1 SOFTWARE FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION
WILMINGTON, DE
Other trademarks owned by GROUP 1 SOFTWARE FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION
WASHINGTON, DC
WASHINGTON, DC
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Angelo N. Chaclas, Jessica L. Elliott, Charles R. Malandra, Jr., Steven J. Shapiro, Martin F. Noonan
ANGELO N CHACLAS, JESSICA L ELLIOTT, C PITNEY BOWES INC35 WATERVIEW DR STE 26-22SHELTON, CT 64848000UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | PRE-RECORDED COMPUTER PROGRAM | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 4, 1986 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 22, 2008 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Oct 20, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 23, 2004 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 23, 2004 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 1994 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jan 3, 1994 | RRPR | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | — |
| Oct 15, 1993 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| May 11, 1993 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Jun 16, 1987 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Apr 27, 1987 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 20, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 19, 1986 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 21, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 23, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |