Drawing for FM ULTRABOND

USPTO serial 73586461

FM ULTRABOND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DEMOS, JOHN C., JR.
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FM ULTRABOND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

WILLIS E. HIGGINS

WILLIS E HIGGINS FLEHR, HOHBACH, TEST, ET ALFOUR EMBARCADERO CTRSTE 3400SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-4187

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
040CUSTOM ELECTROSTATIC COATING OF ARTICLES OF MANUFACTURE WITH POLYMERIC RESINSABANDONEDJun 28, 1985

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 4, 1990ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Sep 4, 1990DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 16, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 4, 1990CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 22, 1989CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 6, 1989CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 7, 1988CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 21, 1987CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Dec 14, 1987DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 19, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 14, 1987CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 12, 1986CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 10, 1986CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 12, 1986DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance