USPTO serial 73586461
FM ULTRABOND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DEMOS, JOHN C., JR.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FM ULTRABOND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WILLIS E. HIGGINS
WILLIS E HIGGINS FLEHR, HOHBACH, TEST, ET ALFOUR EMBARCADERO CTRSTE 3400SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-4187Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 040 | CUSTOM ELECTROSTATIC COATING OF ARTICLES OF MANUFACTURE WITH POLYMERIC RESINS | ABANDONED | Jun 28, 1985 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 4, 1990 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 16, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 4, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 7, 1988 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 1987 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 1987 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 19, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 14, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 10, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 1986 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |