USPTO serial 73586579
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RONALD W. HIND
RONALD W HIND COHN, POWELL, HINDCLAYTON PLZ BLDG7700 CLAYTON RDST LOUIS, MO 63117| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | PRINTED CARD AND LIQUID CRYSTAL DISPLAY FUNCTIONING AS A BIOFEEDBACK SENSOR | ABANDONED | Feb 10, 1986 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 30, 1989 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 1989 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 22, 1988 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| May 27, 1988 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 12, 1988 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 12, 1988 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 9, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 1987 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 17, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 1987 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 12, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 1986 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 13, 1986 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |