Drawing for STRESS-ALERT

USPTO serial 73586579

STRESS-ALERT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CLARK, ROBERT C
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STRESS-ALERT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

RONALD W. HIND

RONALD W HIND COHN, POWELL, HINDCLAYTON PLZ BLDG7700 CLAYTON RDST LOUIS, MO 63117

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009PRINTED CARD AND LIQUID CRYSTAL DISPLAY FUNCTIONING AS A BIOFEEDBACK SENSORABANDONEDFeb 10, 1986

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 30, 1989ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jan 24, 1989EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 22, 1988CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
May 27, 1988ZZZZALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN—
May 12, 1988JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 12, 1988EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 9, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 14, 1988CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 10, 1987CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 17, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 17, 1987CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 12, 1987CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 17, 1986CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 13, 1986CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance